head to head · open source
OpenObserve vs goose
OpenObserve has 22,777 GitHub stars, 1,179 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped yesterday. goose has 1,014 stars, 81 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 2,146% (22,777 vs 1,014 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; goose is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, goose 8%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| OpenObserve | goose | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 23K | ★ 1.0K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.2K | ⑂ 81 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick OpenObserve if
- You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick goose if
- You want the goose feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and goose fits your workflow better
About OpenObserve
Open source Datadog alternative for logs, metrics, traces, and frontend monitoring. Modern observability platform: 10x easier, 140x lower storage cost, high performance, petabyte scale. Cloud · Documentation · Slack · Quickstart OpenObserve (O2) is a cloud native observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring (RUM), and AI/LLM observability. It's a cost effective alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch for teams that need full observability without the complexity or cost — with Parquet columnar storage and an S3 native design that cuts storage costs by up to 140x…
read the full OpenObserve overview →
About goose
Goose: A Powerful Load Testing Framework What is Load Testing? Load testing is a critical step in ensuring your web application can handle real world traffic patterns. It helps you identify performance bottlenecks, optimize resource allocation, and ensure a seamless user experience. Why Choose Goose? Fast and Scalable: Built with Rust, Goose is designed for speed and scalability. Flexible and Customizable: Supports simple and complex load tests, tailored to mimic real world user behavior. Realistic User Behavior Simulation: Goes beyond just sending requests; simulates user behaviors like logging in, filling out…
read the full goose overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is OpenObserve or goose more popular?
OpenObserve has 22,777 GitHub stars and goose has 1,014. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.
Are OpenObserve and goose free?
Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and goose under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between OpenObserve and goose?
OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and goose in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, OpenObserve or goose?
Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,777 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose goose if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.