head to head · open source

OpenObserve vs dd-trace-dotnet

OpenObserve has 22,027 GitHub stars, 1,098 forks, 598 open issues and last shipped today. dd-trace-dotnet has 575 stars, 168 forks, 335 open issues and last shipped today. OpenObserve leads on adoption by 3,731% (22,027 vs 575 stars). OpenObserve is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; dd-trace-dotnet is written in C# under Apache-2.0. OpenObserve has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, dd-trace-dotnet 29%. OpenObserve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (apm, datadog), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenObserve ★ 22K dd-trace-dotnet ★ 575 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenObserve dd-trace-dotnet
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 575
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript C#
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 1.1K ⑂ 168
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenObserve if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenObserve profile →

pick dd-trace-dotnet if

  • You want the dd-trace-dotnet feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You evaluated both and dd-trace-dotnet fits your workflow better

full dd-trace-dotnet profile →

About OpenObserve

OpenObserve is an open source observability platform for logs, metrics, traces, analytics, Real User Monitoring, session replay, pipelines, SLO, and LLM observability. It lives in the cloud native infrastructure ecosystem and is described as an alternative to Datadog, Splunk, and Elasticsearch. The project is built in Rust, ships as a single binary, and uses Parquet columnar storage with an S3 native design.

read the full OpenObserve overview →

About dd-trace-dotnet

dd trace dotnet is the Apache 2.0 C repository containing Datadog's .NET client libraries for application telemetry collection, distributed tracing, and continuous profiling, built for .NET developers and operators who need to instrument .NET applications and send telemetry to the Datadog product suite.

read the full dd-trace-dotnet overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

OpenObserve vs Uptime Kuma OpenObserve vs worldmonitor OpenObserve vs NetData OpenObserve vs Grafana OpenObserve vs huginn OpenObserve vs Sentry OpenObserve vs SigNoz OpenObserve vs Grafana Loki OpenObserve vs beszel OpenObserve vs cilium OpenObserve vs Apache SkyWalking OpenObserve vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenObserve or dd-trace-dotnet more popular?

OpenObserve has 22,027 GitHub stars and dd-trace-dotnet has 575. OpenObserve has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenObserve and dd-trace-dotnet free?

Both are open source. OpenObserve is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and dd-trace-dotnet under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenObserve and dd-trace-dotnet?

OpenObserve is written in TypeScript and dd-trace-dotnet in C#. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenObserve or dd-trace-dotnet?

Choose OpenObserve if you want the larger community (22,027 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose dd-trace-dotnet if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.