head to head · open source

OpenCode vs Jitsu

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars, 27,350 forks, 5,727 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Jitsu has 5,083 stars, 400 forks, 43 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCode leads on adoption by 3,995% (208,150 vs 5,083 stars). OpenCode is written in TypeScript under MIT; Jitsu is written in TypeScript under MIT. OpenCode has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Jitsu 8%. OpenCode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCode ★ 208K Jitsu ★ 5.1K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCode Jitsu
GitHub stars ★ 208K ★ 5.1K
License MIT MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 400
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCode if

  • You weight community size — 208K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCode profile →

pick Jitsu if

  • You want the Jitsu feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Jitsu fits your workflow better

full Jitsu profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is an open source AI coding agent designed to operate across terminal, IDE, and desktop environments. It integrates directly into developer workflows to assist with writing, editing, and understanding code using natural language prompts. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it runs locally or via a desktop app and supports multiple languages and platforms.

read the full OpenCode overview →

About Jitsu

Jitsu is an MIT licensed, self hostable open source event data platform that collects events from websites, apps and servers and delivers them to data warehouses and other tools, built as a fully scriptable alternative to Segment for data teams and developers who want the pipeline inside their own infrastructure.

read the full Jitsu overview →

More in Developer Tools

Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs nango opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital nango vs jitsu opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit opencode vs hercules opencode vs argos nango vs aci-dev nango vs convertigo langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed neovim vs zed

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenCode vs pi OpenCode vs OpenHands OpenCode vs Paperclip OpenCode vs Orca OpenCode vs Cline OpenCode vs Aider OpenCode vs Continue OpenCode vs Tabby OpenCode vs Grok Build OpenCode vs T3 Code OpenCode vs Dyad OpenCode vs SWE-agent

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCode or Jitsu more popular?

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars and Jitsu has 5,083. OpenCode has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCode and Jitsu free?

Both are open source. OpenCode is licensed under MIT and Jitsu under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCode and Jitsu?

OpenCode is written in TypeScript and Jitsu in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCode or Jitsu?

Choose OpenCode if you want the larger community (208,150 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Jitsu if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.