head to head · open source
Logseq vs Open-Notebook
Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars, 2,866 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Open-Notebook has 41,377 stars, 4,762 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 10% (45,460 vs 41,377 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Open-Notebook is written in TypeScript under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Open-Notebook 12%. Open-Notebook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Logseq | Open-Notebook | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 41K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Clojure | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 4.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Logseq if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Clojure
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Open-Notebook if
- You want the Open-Notebook feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and Open-Notebook fits your workflow better
About Logseq
Logseq A privacy first, open source platform for knowledge management and collaboration Home Page Blog Documentation Roadmap Table of Contents 🚀 Database Version 🤔 Why Logseq? 👀 How can I use it? 📚 Learn more 🫶 Support Logseq Development 💡 Feature requests 🔌 Plugin API 🌟 Contributing to Logseq 🛠️ Setting Up a Development Environment ✨ Inspiration 🙏 Thank You 🚀 Database Version The Database version (DB version) of Logseq introduces DB graphs. See this page to get an overview of the main features for DB graphs. If you are an existing user, see changes with the DB version. The DB version has its own new…
read the full Logseq overview →
About Open-Notebook
[![Forks][forks shield]][forks url] [![Stargazers][stars shield]][stars url] [![Issues][issues shield]][issues url] [![MIT License][license shield]][license url] Open Notebook An open source, privacy focused alternative to Google's Notebook LM! Join our Discord server for help, to share workflow ideas, and suggest features! Checkout our website » Follow @lfnovo on X for updates 📚 Get Started · 📖 User Guide · ✨ Features · 🚀 Deploy Deutsch Español français 日本語 한국어 Português Русский 中文 A private, multi model, 100% local, full featured alternative to Notebook LM In a world dominated by Artificial Intelligence…
read the full Open-Notebook overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Logseq or Open-Notebook more popular?
Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars and Open-Notebook has 41,377. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.
Are Logseq and Open-Notebook free?
Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Open-Notebook under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Logseq and Open-Notebook?
Logseq is written in Clojure and Open-Notebook in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Logseq or Open-Notebook?
Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (45,460 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Open-Notebook if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.