head to head · open source

Logseq vs Khoj

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Khoj has 37,390 stars, 2,483 forks, 148 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 20% (44,955 vs 37,390 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Khoj is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Khoj 7%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K Khoj ★ 37K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq Khoj
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 37K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Clojure Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-02
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 2.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick Khoj if

  • You want the Khoj feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Khoj fits your workflow better

full Khoj profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About Khoj

Khoj is a self hostable, open source AI second brain written in Python that turns any local or online large language model into a personal research, automation, and agent platform for individuals, small teams, and enterprises that want their documents and queries kept under their own control.

read the full Khoj overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs logseq appflowy vs khoj appflowy vs memos appflowy vs joplin appflowy vs siyuan memos vs joplin appflowy vs outline appflowy vs open-notebook n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook Logseq vs Blinko

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Khoj more popular?

Logseq has 44,955 GitHub stars and Khoj has 37,390. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and Khoj free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Khoj under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and Khoj?

Logseq is written in Clojure and Khoj in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or Khoj?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,955 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Khoj if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.