head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs open-connector
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. open-connector has 6,170 stars, 588 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped today. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 259% (22,125 vs 6,170 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; open-connector is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, open-connector 10%. open-connector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | open-connector | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 6.2K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Custom / other |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-04 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 588 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick open-connector if
- You want the open-connector feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and open-connector fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About open-connector
English 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 한국어 Русский Français Español OpenConnector is an open source connector gateway for AI agents and an alternative to Pipedream/Composio. Connect user app accounts once, then expose a shared catalog of 1,000+ providers and 10,000+ prebuilt Actions to agents and applications. Managed OAuth and hosted runtime, ready to use. No deployment or OAuth app setup. Run locally or on your own infrastructure with Docker or Node.js. You manage storage and OAuth apps. Cloudflare , Fly.io , RepoCloud , nibrun , and more. 🚀 OOMOL Hosted Self host More platforms Use the Connector SDK from app code, oo CLI as…
read the full open-connector overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or open-connector more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars and open-connector has 6,170. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and open-connector free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0, and open-connector has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and open-connector?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and open-connector in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or open-connector?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,125 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose open-connector if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.