head to head · open source

open-connector vs Integuru

open-connector has 6,170 GitHub stars, 588 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Integuru has 4,791 stars, 378 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. open-connector leads on adoption by 29% (6,170 vs 4,791 stars). open-connector is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; Integuru is written in Python under AGPL-3.0. open-connector has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, Integuru 8%. open-connector was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, automation), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

open-connector ★ 6.2K Integuru ★ 4.8K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

open-connector Integuru
GitHub stars ★ 6.2K ★ 4.8K
License Custom / other AGPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-06-24
Forks ⑂ 588 ⑂ 378
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick open-connector if

  • You weight community size — 6.2K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full open-connector profile →

pick Integuru if

  • You want the Integuru feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and Integuru fits your workflow better

full Integuru profile →

About open-connector

English 简体中文 繁體中文 日本語 한국어 Русский Français Español OpenConnector is an open source connector gateway for AI agents and an alternative to Pipedream/Composio. Connect user app accounts once, then expose a shared catalog of 1,000+ providers and 10,000+ prebuilt Actions to agents and applications. Managed OAuth and hosted runtime, ready to use. No deployment or OAuth app setup. Run locally or on your own infrastructure with Docker or Node.js. You manage storage and OAuth apps. Cloudflare , Fly.io , RepoCloud , nibrun , and more. 🚀 OOMOL Hosted Self host More platforms Use the Connector SDK from app code, oo CLI as…

read the full open-connector overview →

About Integuru

Integuru v0 This repo contains the earliest version of the Integuru agent we released publicly. It shows the original approach: using browser network requests to generate runnable integration code for platforms without official APIs. We've kept building since then. The newest version of Integuru is available at www.integuru.com. Integuru v0 in Action What Integuru v0 Does You use to generate a file containing all browser network requests, a file with the cookies, and write a prompt describing the action triggered in the browser. The agent outputs runnable Python code that hits the platform's internal endpoints…

read the full Integuru overview →

More in Developer Tools

Related comparisons

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

Frequently asked questions

Is open-connector or Integuru more popular?

open-connector has 6,170 GitHub stars and Integuru has 4,791. open-connector has the larger community by that measure.

Are open-connector and Integuru free?

Both are open source. open-connector has no licence declared in this registry, and Integuru is licensed under AGPL-3.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between open-connector and Integuru?

open-connector is written in TypeScript and Integuru in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, open-connector or Integuru?

Choose open-connector if you want the larger community (6,170 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose Integuru if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.