head to head · open source

Onlook vs WWDC

Onlook has 26,887 GitHub stars, 2,125 forks, 380 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. WWDC has 8,742 stars, 767 forks, 23 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Onlook leads on adoption by 208% (26,887 vs 8,742 stars). Onlook is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; WWDC is written in Swift under BSD-2-Clause. Onlook has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, WWDC 9%. Onlook was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Onlook ★ 27K WWDC ★ 8.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Onlook WWDC
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 8.7K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-08-25 2026-06-17
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 767
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Onlook if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Onlook profile →

pick WWDC if

  • You want the WWDC feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and WWDC fits your workflow better

full WWDC profile →

About Onlook

Onlook is an open source, Apache 2.0 visual editor for Next.js and TailwindCSS projects that lets designers and developers edit a running React app in the browser while the underlying code changes in real time.

read the full Onlook overview →

About WWDC

WWDC is an unofficial, open source macOS app for Apple developers who want to watch conference sessions, follow the live schedule, and take searchable notes without leaving their Mac.

read the full WWDC overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 276K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 212K vscode ★ 194K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 114K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Onlook vs ECC Onlook vs react Onlook vs Langflow Onlook vs Supabase Onlook vs puppeteer Onlook vs archify Onlook vs PocketBase Onlook vs i-have-adhd Onlook vs rea Onlook vs codebase-memory-mcp Onlook vs herdr Onlook vs ToolJet

Frequently asked questions

Is Onlook or WWDC more popular?

Onlook has 26,887 GitHub stars and WWDC has 8,742. Onlook has the larger community by that measure.

Are Onlook and WWDC free?

Both are open source. Onlook is licensed under Apache-2.0 and WWDC under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Onlook and WWDC?

Onlook is written in TypeScript and WWDC in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Onlook or WWDC?

Choose Onlook if you want the larger community (26,887 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose WWDC if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.