head to head · open source

Supabase vs Onlook

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars, 14,114 forks, 1,128 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Onlook has 26,752 stars, 2,101 forks, 380 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. Supabase leads on adoption by 311% (109,900 vs 26,752 stars). Supabase is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Onlook is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Supabase has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Onlook 8%. Supabase was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai, nextjs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Supabase ★ 110K Onlook ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Supabase Onlook
GitHub stars ★ 110K ★ 27K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-08-25
Forks ⑂ 14K ⑂ 2.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Supabase if

  • You weight community size — 110K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Supabase profile →

pick Onlook if

  • You want the Onlook feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Onlook fits your workflow better

full Onlook profile →

About Supabase

Supabase is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed Postgres development platform that bundles a dedicated Postgres database with authentication, auto generated APIs, realtime subscriptions, file storage, and edge functions for developers building web, mobile, and AI applications.

read the full Supabase overview →

About Onlook

Onlook is an open source, Apache 2.0 visual editor for Next.js and TailwindCSS projects that lets designers and developers edit a running React app in the browser while the underlying code changes in real time.

read the full Onlook overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

langflow vs supabase langflow vs onlook supabase vs hercules supabase vs argos langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Supabase vs Langflow Supabase vs PocketBase Supabase vs ToolJet Supabase vs AppSmith Supabase vs TipTap Supabase vs Directus Supabase vs Budibase Supabase vs Teable Supabase vs Convex Supabase vs Alokai Supabase vs KeystoneJS Supabase vs HeyForm

Frequently asked questions

Is Supabase or Onlook more popular?

Supabase has 109,900 GitHub stars and Onlook has 26,752. Supabase has the larger community by that measure.

Are Supabase and Onlook free?

Both are open source. Supabase is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Onlook under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Supabase and Onlook?

Supabase is written in TypeScript and Onlook in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Supabase or Onlook?

Choose Supabase if you want the larger community (109,900 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Onlook if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.