head to head · open source

Onlook vs Visual-Code-Space

Onlook has 26,801 GitHub stars, 2,108 forks, 380 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Visual-Code-Space has 675 stars, 83 forks, 75 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. Onlook leads on adoption by 3,871% (26,801 vs 675 stars). Onlook is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0; Visual-Code-Space is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. Onlook has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, Visual-Code-Space 12%. Visual-Code-Space was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (ai, editor, ide), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Onlook ★ 27K Visual-Code-Space ★ 675 category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Onlook Visual-Code-Space
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 675
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Kotlin
Last push 2026-08-25 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 83
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Onlook if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Onlook profile →

pick Visual-Code-Space if

  • You want the Visual-Code-Space feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and Visual-Code-Space fits your workflow better

full Visual-Code-Space profile →

About Onlook

Onlook is an open source, Apache 2.0 visual editor for Next.js and TailwindCSS projects that lets designers and developers edit a running React app in the browser while the underlying code changes in real time.

read the full Onlook overview →

About Visual-Code-Space

Visual Code Space is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed code editor for Android, written in Kotlin, that gives developers a tabbed editing workspace, multi language syntax highlighting and an integrated terminal on a phone or tablet.

read the full Visual-Code-Space overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 266K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

Onlook vs ECC Onlook vs react Onlook vs Langflow Onlook vs Supabase Onlook vs puppeteer Onlook vs archify Onlook vs PocketBase Onlook vs i-have-adhd Onlook vs codebase-memory-mcp Onlook vs ToolJet Onlook vs AppSmith Onlook vs it-tools

Frequently asked questions

Is Onlook or Visual-Code-Space more popular?

Onlook has 26,801 GitHub stars and Visual-Code-Space has 675. Onlook has the larger community by that measure.

Are Onlook and Visual-Code-Space free?

Both are open source. Onlook is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Visual-Code-Space under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Onlook and Visual-Code-Space?

Onlook is written in TypeScript and Visual-Code-Space in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Onlook or Visual-Code-Space?

Choose Onlook if you want the larger community (26,801 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Visual-Code-Space if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.