head to head · open source

one-api vs axonhub

one-api has 36,984 GitHub stars, 6,869 forks, 1,036 open issues and last shipped 9 months ago. axonhub has 5,274 stars, 706 forks, 112 open issues and last shipped today. one-api leads on adoption by 601% (36,984 vs 5,274 stars). one-api is written in JavaScript under MIT; axonhub is written in Go under Apache-2.0. one-api has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, axonhub 13%. axonhub was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api-gateway, claude), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

one-api ★ 37K axonhub ★ 5.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

one-api axonhub
GitHub stars ★ 37K ★ 5.3K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-01-09 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 6.9K ⑂ 706
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick one-api if

  • You weight community size — 37K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full one-api profile →

pick axonhub if

  • You want the axonhub feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and axonhub fits your workflow better

full axonhub profile →

About one-api

One API is a self hosted LLM API management and key redistribution system that exposes many model providers through the standard OpenAI API format, aimed at developers, teams and operators who want a single endpoint, a single key model and a single quota surface across providers.

read the full one-api overview →

About axonhub

AxonHub is an open source AI gateway, written in Go and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, that lets an application call 100+ large language models through whichever AI SDK it already uses and switch providers without changing code — built for developers and platform teams who need one self hostable control point for model access, failover, cost and tracing.

read the full axonhub overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 265K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K

Related comparisons

fastapi vs one-api fastapi vs hoppscotch fastapi vs bruno fastapi vs insomnia fastapi vs openapi-specification fastapi vs openapi-generator fastapi vs redoc hoppscotch vs bruno openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More API Development & Testing projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.

one-api vs fastapi one-api vs Hoppscotch one-api vs Bruno one-api vs Insomnia one-api vs OpenAPI-Specification one-api vs openapi-generator one-api vs redoc one-api vs SafeLine one-api vs Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF one-api vs grpc-gateway one-api vs Yaak one-api vs hurl

Frequently asked questions

Is one-api or axonhub more popular?

one-api has 36,984 GitHub stars and axonhub has 5,274. one-api has the larger community by that measure.

Are one-api and axonhub free?

Both are open source. one-api is licensed under MIT and axonhub under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between one-api and axonhub?

one-api is written in JavaScript and axonhub in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, one-api or axonhub?

Choose one-api if you want the larger community (36,984 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose axonhub if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.