head to head · open source

nnn vs disky

nnn has 21,958 GitHub stars, 819 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped yesterday. disky has 952 stars, 39 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. nnn leads on adoption by 2,207% (21,958 vs 952 stars). nnn is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; disky is written in Kotlin under GPL-3.0. nnn has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, disky 4%. nnn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (android, disk-usage, filesystem), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nnn ★ 22K disky ★ 952 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nnn disky
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 952
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C Kotlin
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-05-31
Forks ⑂ 819 ⑂ 39
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nnn if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nnn profile →

pick disky if

  • You want the disky feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and disky fits your workflow better

full disky profile →

About nnn

nnn (n³) is a tiny, nearly zero config terminal file manager written in C and released under the BSD 2 Clause licence, built for developers, sysadmins, and command line users who want fast filesystem browsing, disk usage analysis, batch renaming, and file picking without leaving the shell.

read the full nnn overview →

About disky

disky is a free, GPL 3.0 licensed Android filesystem analyzer written in Kotlin that shows you the usage of your storage, built for any Android user who wants to find the biggest space thieves on their device.

read the full disky overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

nnn vs Mole nnn vs Pearcleaner nnn vs BleachBit nnn vs dua-cli nnn vs gdu nnn vs RyTuneX nnn vs pomatez nnn vs memories nnn vs portabase nnn vs burrow nnn vs resticprofile nnn vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is nnn or disky more popular?

nnn has 21,958 GitHub stars and disky has 952. nnn has the larger community by that measure.

Are nnn and disky free?

Both are open source. nnn is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and disky under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nnn and disky?

nnn is written in C and disky in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nnn or disky?

Choose nnn if you want the larger community (21,958 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose disky if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.