head to head · open source

nnn vs dua-cli

nnn has 21,895 GitHub stars, 817 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. dua-cli has 6,277 stars, 170 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 7 days ago. nnn leads on adoption by 249% (21,895 vs 6,277 stars). nnn is written in C under BSD-2-Clause; dua-cli is written in Rust under MIT. nnn has attracted 4% as many forks as stars, dua-cli 3%. nnn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (disk-usage), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

nnn ★ 22K dua-cli ★ 6.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

nnn dua-cli
GitHub stars ★ 22K ★ 6.3K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C Rust
Last push 2026-09-16 2026-09-12
Forks ⑂ 817 ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick nnn if

  • You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full nnn profile →

pick dua-cli if

  • You want the dua-cli feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and dua-cli fits your workflow better

full dua-cli profile →

About nnn

nnn (n³) is a tiny, nearly zero config terminal file manager written in C and released under the BSD 2 Clause licence, built for developers, sysadmins, and command line users who want fast filesystem browsing, disk usage analysis, batch renaming, and file picking without leaving the shell.

read the full nnn overview →

About dua-cli

dua cli is a terminal based, parallel disk usage analyzer written in Rust that reports how much space a directory consumes and optionally deletes unwanted data, built for developers, system administrators, and anyone cleaning up storage from a shell rather than a graphical desktop application.

read the full dua-cli overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit excalidraw vs mole rustdesk vs mole excalidraw vs pearcleaner excalidraw vs bleachbit rustdesk vs pearcleaner openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More System Cleanup & Optimization projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the System Cleanup & Optimization field.

nnn vs Mole nnn vs Pearcleaner nnn vs BleachBit nnn vs gdu nnn vs RyTuneX nnn vs pomatez nnn vs memories nnn vs portabase nnn vs resticprofile nnn vs curbox-android

Frequently asked questions

Is nnn or dua-cli more popular?

nnn has 21,895 GitHub stars and dua-cli has 6,277. nnn has the larger community by that measure.

Are nnn and dua-cli free?

Both are open source. nnn is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and dua-cli under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between nnn and dua-cli?

nnn is written in C and dua-cli in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, nnn or dua-cli?

Choose nnn if you want the larger community (21,895 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose dua-cli if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.