head to head · open source

NHost vs Bear

NHost has 9,296 GitHub stars, 623 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped today. Bear has 6,493 stars, 369 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. NHost leads on adoption by 43% (9,296 vs 6,493 stars). NHost is written in Go under MIT; Bear is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. NHost has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, Bear 6%. NHost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NHost ★ 9.3K Bear ★ 6.5K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NHost Bear
GitHub stars ★ 9.3K ★ 6.5K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 623 ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NHost if

  • You weight community size — 9.3K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NHost profile →

pick Bear if

  • You want the Bear feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Bear fits your workflow better

full Bear profile →

About NHost

Nhost is an open source backend as a service platform for modern application development, and the project describes itself as a Firebase alternative with GraphQL. It is built around PostgreSQL for data, Hasura for an instant GraphQL API, authentication, storage, and serverless functions written in Node.js with JavaScript or TypeScript. The project is distributed under the MIT license and is positioned in the developer tools category for build and deployment.

read the full NHost overview →

About Bear

Bear is a GPL 3.0, Rust based command line tool that produces a compile commands.json compilation database for any C or C++ build by recording the compiler invocations that run during it, and it is aimed at developers, code explorers, and CI jobs whose build systems cannot emit that database on their own.

read the full Bear overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

NHost vs vite NHost vs webpack NHost vs Appwrite NHost vs parcel NHost vs esbuild NHost vs Harness NHost vs Dokku NHost vs turborepo NHost vs nx NHost vs NocoBase NHost vs gradle NHost vs rspack

Frequently asked questions

Is NHost or Bear more popular?

NHost has 9,296 GitHub stars and Bear has 6,493. NHost has the larger community by that measure.

Are NHost and Bear free?

Both are open source. NHost is licensed under MIT and Bear under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between NHost and Bear?

NHost is written in Go and Bear in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NHost or Bear?

Choose NHost if you want the larger community (9,296 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Bear if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.