head to head · open source

NocoBase vs NHost

NocoBase has 24,294 GitHub stars, 2,879 forks, 307 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NHost has 9,296 stars, 623 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped today. NocoBase leads on adoption by 161% (24,294 vs 9,296 stars). NocoBase is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; NHost is written in Go under MIT. NocoBase has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, NHost 7%. NHost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

NocoBase ★ 24K NHost ★ 9.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

NocoBase NHost
GitHub stars ★ 24K ★ 9.3K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 623
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick NocoBase if

  • You weight community size — 24K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full NocoBase profile →

pick NHost if

  • You want the NHost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and NHost fits your workflow better

full NHost profile →

About NocoBase

NocoBase is an open source AI plus no code platform, written in TypeScript, for teams and non developers who need to build and run internal business systems such as admin dashboards, CRM, and ERP tooling.

read the full NocoBase overview →

About NHost

Nhost is an open source backend as a service platform for modern application development, and the project describes itself as a Firebase alternative with GraphQL. It is built around PostgreSQL for data, Hasura for an instant GraphQL API, authentication, storage, and serverless functions written in Node.js with JavaScript or TypeScript. The project is distributed under the MIT license and is positioned in the developer tools category for build and deployment.

read the full NHost overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite kubernetes vs dokku vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

NocoBase vs vite NocoBase vs webpack NocoBase vs Appwrite NocoBase vs parcel NocoBase vs esbuild NocoBase vs Harness NocoBase vs Dokku NocoBase vs turborepo NocoBase vs nx NocoBase vs gradle NocoBase vs rspack NocoBase vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is NocoBase or NHost more popular?

NocoBase has 24,294 GitHub stars and NHost has 9,296. NocoBase has the larger community by that measure.

Are NocoBase and NHost free?

Both are open source. NocoBase has no licence declared in this registry, and NHost is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between NocoBase and NHost?

NocoBase is written in TypeScript and NHost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, NocoBase or NHost?

Choose NocoBase if you want the larger community (24,294 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose NHost if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.