head to head · open source

Dokku vs NHost

Dokku has 32,147 GitHub stars, 2,075 forks, 36 open issues and last shipped today. NHost has 9,296 stars, 623 forks, 164 open issues and last shipped today. Dokku leads on adoption by 246% (32,147 vs 9,296 stars). Dokku is written in Go under MIT; NHost is written in Go under MIT. Dokku has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, NHost 7%. NHost was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Dokku ★ 32K NHost ★ 9.3K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Dokku NHost
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 9.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 623
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Dokku if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Dokku profile →

pick NHost if

  • You want the NHost feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and NHost fits your workflow better

full NHost profile →

About Dokku

Dokku is a self hosted Platform as a Service (PaaS) that runs on a single server using Docker containers. It enables developers to deploy applications using familiar workflows like git push , mimicking the simplicity of Heroku while running entirely under the user’s control. Dokku lives in the DevOps and infrastructure automation ecosystem, targeting teams that want PaaS convenience without relying on cloud vendor lock in.

read the full Dokku overview →

About NHost

Nhost is an open source backend as a service platform for modern application development, and the project describes itself as a Firebase alternative with GraphQL. It is built around PostgreSQL for data, Hasura for an instant GraphQL API, authentication, storage, and serverless functions written in Node.js with JavaScript or TypeScript. The project is distributed under the MIT license and is positioned in the developer tools category for build and deployment.

read the full NHost overview →

More in Developer Tools

ECC ★ 263K react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs dokku openclaw vs harness react vs vite supabase vs appwrite vite vs webpack vite vs appwrite vite vs parcel webpack vs appwrite openclaw vs langflow ecc vs react ecc vs langflow react vs langflow ecc vs supabase react vs supabase n8n vs langflow ecc vs puppeteer openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip

More Build & Deployment projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Build & Deployment field.

Dokku vs vite Dokku vs webpack Dokku vs Appwrite Dokku vs parcel Dokku vs esbuild Dokku vs Harness Dokku vs turborepo Dokku vs nx Dokku vs NocoBase Dokku vs gradle Dokku vs rspack Dokku vs devbox

Frequently asked questions

Is Dokku or NHost more popular?

Dokku has 32,147 GitHub stars and NHost has 9,296. Dokku has the larger community by that measure.

Are Dokku and NHost free?

Both are open source. Dokku is licensed under MIT and NHost under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Dokku and NHost?

Dokku is written in Go and NHost in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Dokku or NHost?

Choose Dokku if you want the larger community (32,147 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose NHost if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.