head to head · open source
nextai-translator vs chatGPTBox
nextai-translator has 25,019 GitHub stars, 1,854 forks, 529 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. chatGPTBox has 10,773 stars, 881 forks, 211 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. nextai-translator leads on adoption by 132% (25,019 vs 10,773 stars). nextai-translator is written in TypeScript under AGPL-3.0; chatGPTBox is written in JavaScript under MIT. nextai-translator has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, chatGPTBox 8%. chatGPTBox was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser-extension, chatgpt, chrome-extension), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| nextai-translator | chatGPTBox | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 25K | ★ 11K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.9K | ⑂ 881 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick nextai-translator if
- You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chatGPTBox if
- You want the chatGPTBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and chatGPTBox fits your workflow better
About nextai-translator
Due to receiving a trademark ownership warning from OpenAI, this project and product has been renamed to nextai translator. We hope you understand. English 中文 The translator that does more than just translation Why Yet another Translator I have developed a Bob plugin that utilizes ChatGPT API to provide global word translation on macOS. However, since not all users have access to macOS to benefit from the plugin, I have created this project! More than just a browser extension What began as a Chrome extension has now evolved into a multi platform desktop app that I am currently developing. More than just…
read the full nextai-translator overview →
About chatGPTBox
ChatGPTBox Deep ChatGPT integrations in your browser, completely for free. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [ ][release url] [![verify][verify image]][verify url] [![coverage][coverage image]][coverage url] English Indonesia 简体中文 日本語 Türkçe Install [![Chrome][Chrome image]][Chrome url] [![Edge][Edge image]][Edge url] [![Firefox][Firefox image]][Firefox url] [![Safari][Safari image]][Safari url] [![Android][Android image]][Android url] [![GitHub][Github image]][Github url] Guide Preview [Development & Contributing][dev url] Video Demonstration Credits [dev url]…
read the full chatGPTBox overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is nextai-translator or chatGPTBox more popular?
nextai-translator has 25,019 GitHub stars and chatGPTBox has 10,773. nextai-translator has the larger community by that measure.
Are nextai-translator and chatGPTBox free?
Both are open source. nextai-translator is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and chatGPTBox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between nextai-translator and chatGPTBox?
nextai-translator is written in TypeScript and chatGPTBox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, nextai-translator or chatGPTBox?
Choose nextai-translator if you want the larger community (25,019 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose chatGPTBox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.