head to head · open source

Nango vs ACI.dev

Nango has 12,203 GitHub stars, 1,353 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ACI.dev has 4,891 stars, 485 forks, 63 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Nango leads on adoption by 149% (12,203 vs 4,891 stars). Nango is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; ACI.dev is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Nango has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, ACI.dev 10%. Nango was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (api, oauth2), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Nango ★ 12K ACI.dev ★ 4.9K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Nango ACI.dev
GitHub stars ★ 12K ★ 4.9K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-05-28
Forks ⑂ 1.4K ⑂ 485
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Nango if

  • You weight community size — 12K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Nango profile →

pick ACI.dev if

  • You want the ACI.dev feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ACI.dev fits your workflow better

full ACI.dev profile →

About Nango

Nango is an open source platform for building product integrations in the developer tools and integration platforms ecosystem. It connects a product and AI agents with 900+ APIs, and it lets developers write integration logic as TypeScript functions or generate that logic with an AI builder before deploying it to Nango's production runtime.

read the full Nango overview →

About ACI.dev

ACI.dev is an open source tool calling platform that connects more than 600 tools to any agentic IDE or custom AI agent. It lives in the Python ecosystem and is released under the Apache 2.0 license, with the backend, developer portal, and integrations all published as open source. Agents reach tools either through direct function calling or through a Unified Model Context Protocol (MCP) server, and the same capabilities are also exposed through a lightweight Python SDK and a TypeScript SDK that work with any LLM framework.

read the full ACI.dev overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs nango opencode vs aci-dev nango vs jitsu nango vs convertigo opencode vs jitsu opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More Integration Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Integration Platforms field.

Nango vs Jitsu Nango vs Convertigo Nango vs Orbital

Frequently asked questions

Is Nango or ACI.dev more popular?

Nango has 12,203 GitHub stars and ACI.dev has 4,891. Nango has the larger community by that measure.

Are Nango and ACI.dev free?

Both are open source. Nango has no licence declared in this registry, and ACI.dev is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Nango and ACI.dev?

Nango is written in TypeScript and ACI.dev in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Nango or ACI.dev?

Choose Nango if you want the larger community (12,203 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose ACI.dev if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.