head to head · open source
n8n vs flowgram.ai
n8n has 209,375 GitHub stars, 61,361 forks, 1,143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowgram.ai has 8,551 stars, 783 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped yesterday. n8n leads on adoption by 2,349% (209,375 vs 8,551 stars). n8n is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. n8n has attracted 29% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. n8n was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai, automation, data-flow, integration-framework), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| n8n | flowgram.ai | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 209K | ★ 8.6K |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 61K | ⑂ 783 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick n8n if
- You weight community size — 209K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick flowgram.ai if
- You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better
About n8n
n8n – The Platform for AI Agents and Workflow Automation Fair code platform to build and deploy AI agents and workflows. Combine a visual canvas with custom code, run it self hosted or in the cloud, and connect to 1500+ integrations. AI automation you can trust with real work, from prototype to production. Key Capabilities AI Native Automation Platform : Build and operationalize AI workflows and multi step agents using your own data, models, and tools Model Flexibility, No Lock In : Connect to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or open source models and switch providers without changing your architecture From Prototype…
About flowgram.ai
FlowGram｜Workflow development framework English 中文 Español Русский Português Deutsch 日本語 FlowGram is a composable, visual, easy to integrate, and extensible workflow development framework & toolkit. Our goal is to help developers build AI workflow platforms faster and simpler . FlowGram comes with a suite of built in tools for workflow development: flow canvas, node configuration form, variable scope chain, and ready to use materials (LLM, Condition, Code Editor etc). It’s not a ready made workflow platform; it’s the framework and toolkit to build yours. Learn more at FlowGram.AI 🌐 🎬 Demo Open in CodeSandbox…
read the full flowgram.ai overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is n8n or flowgram.ai more popular?
n8n has 209,375 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,551. n8n has the larger community by that measure.
Are n8n and flowgram.ai free?
Both are open source. n8n has no licence declared in this registry, and flowgram.ai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between n8n and flowgram.ai?
n8n is written in TypeScript and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, n8n or flowgram.ai?
Choose n8n if you want the larger community (209,375 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.