head to head · open source

n8n vs flowgram.ai

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars, 60,739 forks, 1,143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. flowgram.ai has 8,454 stars, 769 forks, 110 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. n8n leads on adoption by 2,324% (204,887 vs 8,454 stars). n8n is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; flowgram.ai is written in TypeScript under MIT. n8n has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, flowgram.ai 9%. n8n was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (ai, automation, data-flow, integration-framework), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

n8n ★ 205K flowgram.ai ★ 8.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

n8n flowgram.ai
GitHub stars ★ 205K ★ 8.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-01
Forks ⑂ 61K ⑂ 769
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick n8n if

  • You weight community size — 205K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full n8n profile →

pick flowgram.ai if

  • You want the flowgram.ai feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and flowgram.ai fits your workflow better

full flowgram.ai profile →

About n8n

n8n is a visual workflow automation platform built in TypeScript that combines a drag and drop editor with custom code execution. It lives in the integration and automation ecosystem, positioned as an open alternative to proprietary services like Zapier. Users design multi step workflows—called “n8n flows”—that connect apps, services, and custom logic to automate repetitive tasks.

read the full n8n overview →

About flowgram.ai

FlowGram is an MIT licensed TypeScript framework and toolkit that gives developers a free or fixed layout canvas, a node configuration form engine, a variable scope chain, and ready to use materials such as LLM, Condition, and Code Editor nodes so they can build their own AI workflow platforms faster and simpler.

read the full flowgram.ai overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap n8n vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit n8n vs organic-maps n8n vs osmand n8n vs comaps n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online n8n vs rustdesk

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

n8n vs Browser Use n8n vs frigate n8n vs Lightpanda n8n vs ProxmoxVE n8n vs ActivePieces n8n vs Skyvern n8n vs Automa n8n vs LiveKit n8n vs amis n8n vs Windmill n8n vs Botpress n8n vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n or flowgram.ai more popular?

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars and flowgram.ai has 8,454. n8n has the larger community by that measure.

Are n8n and flowgram.ai free?

Both are open source. n8n has no licence declared in this registry, and flowgram.ai is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between n8n and flowgram.ai?

n8n is written in TypeScript and flowgram.ai in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, n8n or flowgram.ai?

Choose n8n if you want the larger community (204,887 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose flowgram.ai if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.