head to head · open source

n8n vs cadence

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars, 60,739 forks, 1,143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. cadence has 9,444 stars, 913 forks, 205 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. n8n leads on adoption by 2,069% (204,887 vs 9,444 stars). n8n is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; cadence is written in Go under Apache-2.0. n8n has attracted 30% as many forks as stars, cadence 10%. n8n was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

n8n ★ 205K cadence ★ 9.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

n8n cadence
GitHub stars ★ 205K ★ 9.4K
License Custom / other Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 61K ⑂ 913
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick n8n if

  • You weight community size — 205K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full n8n profile →

pick cadence if

  • You want the cadence feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and cadence fits your workflow better

full cadence profile →

About n8n

n8n is a visual workflow automation platform built in TypeScript that combines a drag and drop editor with custom code execution. It lives in the integration and automation ecosystem, positioned as an open alternative to proprietary services like Zapier. Users design multi step workflows—called “n8n flows”—that connect apps, services, and custom logic to automate repetitive tasks.

read the full n8n overview →

About cadence

Cadence is an open source orchestration engine for running asynchronous, long running business logic in a fault tolerant way. Written in Go under the Apache 2.0 license, it lives in the distributed systems and workflow automation space, and the project has been open source since 2017. This repository holds the core engine plus supporting tools: the CLI, schema management, a benchmark suite, and a canary. Client libraries for Go and Java are official, while Python and Ruby SDKs come from the community, and iWF can be layered on top as a DSL framework.

read the full cadence overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap n8n vs snapify n8n vs mole n8n vs pearcleaner n8n vs bleachbit n8n vs organic-maps n8n vs osmand n8n vs comaps n8n vs cryptpad n8n vs onlyoffice-docs n8n vs libreoffice n8n vs ironcalc n8n vs collabora-online n8n vs rustdesk

More Automation projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.

n8n vs Browser Use n8n vs frigate n8n vs Lightpanda n8n vs ProxmoxVE n8n vs ActivePieces n8n vs Skyvern n8n vs Automa n8n vs LiveKit n8n vs amis n8n vs Windmill n8n vs Botpress n8n vs mitosis

Frequently asked questions

Is n8n or cadence more popular?

n8n has 204,887 GitHub stars and cadence has 9,444. n8n has the larger community by that measure.

Are n8n and cadence free?

Both are open source. n8n has no licence declared in this registry, and cadence is licensed under Apache-2.0. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between n8n and cadence?

n8n is written in TypeScript and cadence in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, n8n or cadence?

Choose n8n if you want the larger community (204,887 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose cadence if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.