head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs swagger-core
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,109 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. swagger-core has 7,534 stars, 2,255 forks, 197 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 193% (22,109 vs 7,534 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; swagger-core is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, swagger-core 30%. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | swagger-core | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 7.5K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick swagger-core if
- You want the swagger-core feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and swagger-core fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About swagger-core
Swagger Core NOTE: If you're looking for Swagger Core 1.5.X and OpenAPI 2.0, please refer to 1.5 branch. NOTE: Since version 2.1.7, Swagger Core also supports the Jakarta namespace. There are a parallel set of artifacts with the jakarta suffix, providing the same functionality as the unsuffixed (i.e.: javax ) artifacts. Please see the Wiki for more details. NOTE: Since version 2.2.0 Swagger Core supports OpenAPI 3.1; see this page for details Swagger Core is a Java implementation of the OpenAPI Specification. Current version supports JAX RS2 ( javax and jakarta namespaces). Get started with Swagger Core! See the…
read the full swagger-core overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or swagger-core more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,109 GitHub stars and swagger-core has 7,534. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and swagger-core free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and swagger-core under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and swagger-core?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and swagger-core in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or swagger-core?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,109 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose swagger-core if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.