head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs shenyu
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,109 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. shenyu has 8,911 stars, 3,105 forks, 565 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 148% (22,109 vs 8,911 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; shenyu is written in Java under Apache-2.0. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, shenyu 35%. shenyu was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | shenyu | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 8.9K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Python | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 3.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick shenyu if
- You want the shenyu feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and shenyu fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About shenyu
Scalable, High Performance, Responsive API Gateway Solution for all MicroServices Architecture Why named Apache ShenYu ShenYu (神禹) is the honorific name of Chinese ancient monarch Xia Yu (also known in later times as Da Yu), who left behind the touching story of the three times he crossed the Yellow River for the benefit of the people and successfully managed the flooding of the river. He is known as one of the three greatest kings of ancient China, along with Yao and Shun. Firstly, the name ShenYu is to promote the traditional virtues of our Chinese civilisation. Secondly, the most important thing about the…
read the full shenyu overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or shenyu more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,109 GitHub stars and shenyu has 8,911. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and shenyu free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and shenyu under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and shenyu?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and shenyu in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or shenyu?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,109 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose shenyu if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.