head to head · open source
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF vs RWKV-Runner
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars, 3,800 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. RWKV-Runner has 6,500 stars, 594 forks, 178 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF leads on adoption by 240% (22,125 vs 6,500 stars). Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python under GPL-3.0; RWKV-Runner is written in TypeScript under MIT. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has attracted 17% as many forks as stars, RWKV-Runner 9%. RWKV-Runner was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF | RWKV-Runner | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 22K | ★ 6.5K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.8K | ⑂ 594 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if
- You weight community size — 22K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick RWKV-Runner if
- You want the RWKV-Runner feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and RWKV-Runner fits your workflow better
About Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF
Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) Mobile Security Framework (MobSF) is a security research platform for mobile applications in Android, iOS and Windows Mobile. MobSF can be used for a variety of use cases such as mobile application security, penetration testing, malware analysis, and privacy analysis. The Static Analyzer supports popular mobile app binaries like APK, IPA, APPX and source code. Meanwhile, the Dynamic Analyzer supports both Android and iOS applications and offers a platform for interactive instrumented testing, runtime data and network traffic analysis. MobSF seamlessly integrates with your…
read the full Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF overview →
About RWKV-Runner
RWKV Runner This project aims to eliminate the barriers of using large language models by automating everything for you. All you need is a lightweight executable program of just a few megabytes. Additionally, this project provides an interface compatible with the OpenAI API, which means that every ChatGPT client is an RWKV client. [![license][license image]][license url] [![release][release image]][release url] [![py version][py version image]][py version url] English 简体中文 日本語 Install [![Windows][Windows image]][Windows url] [![MacOS][MacOS image]][MacOS url] [![Linux][Linux image]][Linux url] FAQs Preview…
read the full RWKV-Runner overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More API Development & Testing projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the API Development & Testing field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or RWKV-Runner more popular?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has 22,125 GitHub stars and RWKV-Runner has 6,500. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF has the larger community by that measure.
Are Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and RWKV-Runner free?
Both are open source. Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is licensed under GPL-3.0 and RWKV-Runner under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF and RWKV-Runner?
Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF is written in Python and RWKV-Runner in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF or RWKV-Runner?
Choose Mobile-Security-Framework-MobSF if you want the larger community (22,125 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose RWKV-Runner if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.