head to head · open source

metrics vs gf

metrics has 17,202 GitHub stars, 2,275 forks, 68 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. gf has 13,272 stars, 1,719 forks, 148 open issues and last shipped yesterday. metrics leads on adoption by 30% (17,202 vs 13,272 stars). metrics is written in JavaScript under MIT; gf is written in Go under MIT. metrics has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, gf 13%. gf was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

metrics ★ 17K gf ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

metrics gf
GitHub stars ★ 17K ★ 13K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-05-29 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 2.3K ⑂ 1.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick metrics if

  • You weight community size — 17K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full metrics profile →

pick gf if

  • You want the gf feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gf fits your workflow better

full gf profile →

About metrics

Metrics is an infographics generator for GitHub accounts, published under the MIT license and written in JavaScript. It lives in the GitHub ecosystem as a GitHub Action and as a hosted web service, and it produces statistics about a user, an organization, or a repository. The output is rendered as SVG, Markdown, PDF, or JSON, which means the same generated figures can be embedded in a profile readme, attached to a blog post, or consumed by another tool.

read the full metrics overview →

About gf

GoFrame is an MIT licensed, production ready application framework for the Go programming language that provides a full stack toolkit — HTTP server, ORM, logging, tracing, and command line scaffolding — in a single dependency, aimed at Go teams that want one coherent framework instead of assembling many separate libraries.

read the full gf overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

metrics vs Uptime Kuma metrics vs worldmonitor metrics vs NetData metrics vs Grafana metrics vs huginn metrics vs Sentry metrics vs SigNoz metrics vs Grafana Loki metrics vs beszel metrics vs cilium metrics vs Apache SkyWalking metrics vs jaeger

Frequently asked questions

Is metrics or gf more popular?

metrics has 17,202 GitHub stars and gf has 13,272. metrics has the larger community by that measure.

Are metrics and gf free?

Both are open source. metrics is licensed under MIT and gf under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between metrics and gf?

metrics is written in JavaScript and gf in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, metrics or gf?

Choose metrics if you want the larger community (17,202 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gf if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.