head to head · open source
loopx vs lazyskills
loopx has 6,371 GitHub stars, 607 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped today. lazyskills has 581 stars, 78 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 24 days ago. loopx leads on adoption by 997% (6,371 vs 581 stars). loopx is written in Python under Apache-2.0; lazyskills is written in Go under MIT. loopx has attracted 10% as many forks as stars, lazyskills 13%. loopx was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (ai-agents, claude-code), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| loopx | lazyskills | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 6.4K | ★ 581 |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-20 | 2026-09-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 607 | ⑂ 78 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick loopx if
- You weight community size — 6.4K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick lazyskills if
- You want the lazyskills feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and lazyskills fits your workflow better
About loopx
LoopX The open, provider neutral, stateful control plane for long horizon agents. Runs on top of Codex, Claude Code, Cursor, and other agent harnesses. LoopX preserves objectives, gates, todos, evidence, quota, and handoffs across turns; the harness executes bounded work. Public website · Blog · Docs · Developer Book · Try LoopX · See real loops · How it works · 简体中文 Open and provider neutral, LoopX is a lightweight state kernel and local first control plane for loop engineering. It runs on top of different agent harnesses rather than replacing them, providing the long horizon state, semantic decisions about…
read the full loopx overview →
About lazyskills
Lazy Skills Blazing fast mission control for agent skills. "I don't debug broken skills by hand I have a TUI to be disappointed for me." 🌴 Overview LazySkills is a blazing fast terminal UI for managing agent skills. It gives you one place to see what is installed, which agents can use each skill, why visibility may be broken, and what actions are safe to run next. ✨ Features See every skill in one place project, global, universal, and agent specific skills in a single TUI. Check agent visibility switch agents and see which skills are actually usable by Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, Cursor, Gemini CLI, and many…
read the full lazyskills overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Automation projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Automation field.
Frequently asked questions
Is loopx or lazyskills more popular?
loopx has 6,371 GitHub stars and lazyskills has 581. loopx has the larger community by that measure.
Are loopx and lazyskills free?
Both are open source. loopx is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazyskills under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between loopx and lazyskills?
loopx is written in Python and lazyskills in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, loopx or lazyskills?
Choose loopx if you want the larger community (6,371 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose lazyskills if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.