head to head · open source

Logseq vs Textus

Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars, 2,866 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Textus has 577 stars, 31 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logseq leads on adoption by 7,779% (45,460 vs 577 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; Textus is written in TypeScript under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Textus 5%. Textus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (markdown, note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K Textus ★ 577 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq Textus
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 577
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Clojure TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-01 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 31
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick Textus if

  • You want the Textus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Textus fits your workflow better

full Textus profile →

About Logseq

Logseq A privacy first, open source platform for knowledge management and collaboration Home Page Blog Documentation Roadmap Table of Contents 🚀 Database Version 🤔 Why Logseq? 👀 How can I use it? 📚 Learn more 🫶 Support Logseq Development 💡 Feature requests 🔌 Plugin API 🌟 Contributing to Logseq 🛠️ Setting Up a Development Environment ✨ Inspiration 🙏 Thank You 🚀 Database Version The Database version (DB version) of Logseq introduces DB graphs. See this page to get an overview of the main features for DB graphs. If you are an existing user, see changes with the DB version. The DB version has its own new…

read the full Logseq overview →

About Textus

Textus The next generation Markdown editor. You hold the pen. AI keeps your ink flowing. Website · Download English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español · Français · Deutsch · Русский · Português Watch on YouTube · Bilibili Hamlet , William Shakespeare Get Textus Free and open source, under the MIT license. iOS and iPadOS are coming soon. Beta: in Settings › General › About Textus , set Update channel to Beta . Writing What you see is what you get, laid out with Markdown as you type. Export to PDF, Word, HTML and more. Textus AI Works with online and local LLMs alike AI that speeds your writing along. Plugins (in…

read the full Textus overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or Textus more popular?

Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars and Textus has 577. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and Textus free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Textus under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and Textus?

Logseq is written in Clojure and Textus in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or Textus?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (45,460 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Textus if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.