head to head · open source
Logseq vs GitJournal
Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars, 2,866 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. GitJournal has 4,246 stars, 317 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 5 months ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 971% (45,460 vs 4,246 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; GitJournal is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, GitJournal 7%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (git, knowledge-graph, markdown, note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Logseq | GitJournal | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 45K | ★ 4.2K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Written in | Clojure | Dart |
| Last push | 2026-11-01 | 2026-05-26 |
| Forks | ⑂ 2.9K | ⑂ 317 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Logseq if
- You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Clojure
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick GitJournal if
- You want the GitJournal feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Dart
- You evaluated both and GitJournal fits your workflow better
About Logseq
Logseq A privacy first, open source platform for knowledge management and collaboration Home Page Blog Documentation Roadmap Table of Contents 🚀 Database Version 🤔 Why Logseq? 👀 How can I use it? 📚 Learn more 🫶 Support Logseq Development 💡 Feature requests 🔌 Plugin API 🌟 Contributing to Logseq 🛠️ Setting Up a Development Environment ✨ Inspiration 🙏 Thank You 🚀 Database Version The Database version (DB version) of Logseq introduces DB graphs. See this page to get an overview of the main features for DB graphs. If you are an existing user, see changes with the DB version. The DB version has its own new…
read the full Logseq overview →
About GitJournal
Mobile first Markdown Notes integrated with Git Summary GitJournal is a note taking app focused on privacy and data portability. It stores all its notes in a standardized Markdown + YAML header format (optional). The notes are stored in a Git Repo of your choice GitHub / Gitlab / Custom provider. This means you can easily self host or host your notes in one of the many Git providers. Screenshots Migrating from Existing Apps Google Keep Day One Classic Narrate Simplenote Contributing Please feel free to open an issue for any bug or feature request. Additionally, you can vote on existing Issues by reacting with a…
read the full GitJournal overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Logseq or GitJournal more popular?
Logseq has 45,460 GitHub stars and GitJournal has 4,246. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.
Are Logseq and GitJournal free?
Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and GitJournal under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Logseq and GitJournal?
Logseq is written in Clojure and GitJournal in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Logseq or GitJournal?
Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (45,460 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose GitJournal if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.