head to head · open source

Logseq vs GitJournal

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. GitJournal has 4,224 stars, 309 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. Logseq leads on adoption by 965% (44,972 vs 4,224 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; GitJournal is written in Dart under AGPL-3.0. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, GitJournal 7%. Logseq was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 4 topic tags (git, knowledge-graph, markdown, note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K GitJournal ★ 4.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq GitJournal
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 4.2K
License AGPL-3.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Clojure Dart
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-05-26
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 309
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick GitJournal if

  • You want the GitJournal feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You evaluated both and GitJournal fits your workflow better

full GitJournal profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About GitJournal

GitJournal is a mobile first, privacy focused Markdown note taking app that stores every note in a Git repository of the user's choosing, built for people who want their writing to stay portable and version controlled instead of locked inside a proprietary sync service.

read the full GitJournal overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or GitJournal more popular?

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars and GitJournal has 4,224. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and GitJournal free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and GitJournal under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and GitJournal?

Logseq is written in Clojure and GitJournal in Dart. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or GitJournal?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,972 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose GitJournal if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.