head to head · open source

Logseq vs fsnotes

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars, 2,815 forks, 942 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fsnotes has 7,494 stars, 578 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logseq leads on adoption by 500% (44,972 vs 7,494 stars). Logseq is written in Clojure under AGPL-3.0; fsnotes is written in Swift under MIT. Logseq has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, fsnotes 8%. fsnotes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (markdown, note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Logseq ★ 45K fsnotes ★ 7.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Logseq fsnotes
GitHub stars ★ 45K ★ 7.5K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Clojure Swift
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.8K ⑂ 578
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Logseq if

  • You weight community size — 45K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Logseq profile →

pick fsnotes if

  • You want the fsnotes feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and fsnotes fits your workflow better

full fsnotes profile →

About Logseq

Logseq is an open source, privacy first knowledge management platform built for local first workflows. It runs as a desktop application and web interface, storing data locally in Markdown or Org mode files, with optional SQLite backed DB graphs for advanced features. The project lives in the Clojure/ClojureScript ecosystem and is licensed under AGPL 3.0.

read the full Logseq overview →

About fsnotes

FSNotes is a fast, native Markdown and plain text note taking app for macOS and iOS, written in Swift 5 and released under the MIT licence, built for people who want their notes kept as portable files rather than inside a proprietary database.

read the full fsnotes overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Logseq vs AppFlowy Logseq vs Memos Logseq vs Joplin Logseq vs SiYuan Logseq vs Outline Logseq vs Open-Notebook Logseq vs Khoj Logseq vs Docmost Logseq vs Tolaria Logseq vs SurfSense Logseq vs Zotero Logseq vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Logseq or fsnotes more popular?

Logseq has 44,972 GitHub stars and fsnotes has 7,494. Logseq has the larger community by that measure.

Are Logseq and fsnotes free?

Both are open source. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and fsnotes under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Logseq and fsnotes?

Logseq is written in Clojure and fsnotes in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Logseq or fsnotes?

Choose Logseq if you want the larger community (44,972 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose fsnotes if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.