head to head · open source

LocalSend vs ffsend

LocalSend has 92,046 GitHub stars, 5,136 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ffsend has 7,413 stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 1,142% (92,046 vs 7,413 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 92K ffsend ★ 7.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend ffsend
GitHub stars ★ 92K ★ 7.4K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Dart Rust
Last push 2026-09-14 2025-11-20
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 205
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 92K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick ffsend if

  • You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better

full ffsend profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop LocalSend vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or ffsend more popular?

LocalSend has 92,046 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,413. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and ffsend free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and ffsend?

LocalSend is written in Dart and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or ffsend?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,046 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.