head to head · open source

LocalSend vs FarManager

LocalSend has 93,197 GitHub stars, 5,204 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped yesterday. FarManager has 2,232 stars, 248 forks, 156 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LocalSend leads on adoption by 4,075% (93,197 vs 2,232 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; FarManager is written in C++ under BSD-3-Clause. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, FarManager 11%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 93K FarManager ★ 2.2K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend FarManager
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 2.2K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Dart C++
Last push 2026-10-02 2026-10-02
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 248
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick FarManager if

  • You want the FarManager feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and FarManager fits your workflow better

full FarManager profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About FarManager

Far Manager is a text mode file and archive manager for Windows, built in C++ under a BSD 3 Clause licence, aimed at users and administrators who prefer a keyboard driven console interface for file operations and who want to extend the tool through plugins.

read the full FarManager overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or FarManager more popular?

LocalSend has 93,197 GitHub stars and FarManager has 2,232. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and FarManager free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and FarManager under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and FarManager?

LocalSend is written in Dart and FarManager in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or FarManager?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (93,197 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose FarManager if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.