head to head · open source

LocalSend vs fanbox

LocalSend has 93,697 GitHub stars, 5,228 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. fanbox has 1,021 stars, 148 forks, 5 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. LocalSend leads on adoption by 9,077% (93,697 vs 1,021 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; fanbox is written in JavaScript under MIT. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, fanbox 14%. LocalSend was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 94K fanbox ★ 1.0K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend fanbox
GitHub stars ★ 94K ★ 1.0K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Dart JavaScript
Last push 2026-10-07 2026-09-03
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 148
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 94K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick fanbox if

  • You want the fanbox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and fanbox fits your workflow better

full fanbox profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About fanbox

FanBox is a local first macOS cockpit for running coding agents like Claude Code and Codex alongside your files, aimed at developers whose AI generated projects have scattered across their disk.

read the full fanbox overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 207K Excalidraw ★ 134K RustDesk ★ 125K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or fanbox more popular?

LocalSend has 93,697 GitHub stars and fanbox has 1,021. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and fanbox free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and fanbox under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and fanbox?

LocalSend is written in Dart and fanbox in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or fanbox?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (93,697 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose fanbox if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.