head to head · open source

LocalSend vs doublecmd

LocalSend has 92,628 GitHub stars, 5,166 forks, 1,113 open issues and last shipped yesterday. doublecmd has 4,564 stars, 356 forks, 634 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LocalSend leads on adoption by 1,930% (92,628 vs 4,564 stars). LocalSend is written in Dart under Apache-2.0; doublecmd is written in Pascal under GPL-2.0. LocalSend has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, doublecmd 8%. doublecmd was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

LocalSend ★ 93K doublecmd ★ 4.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

LocalSend doublecmd
GitHub stars ★ 93K ★ 4.6K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Dart Pascal
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 356
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick LocalSend if

  • You weight community size — 93K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Dart
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full LocalSend profile →

pick doublecmd if

  • You want the doublecmd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Pascal
  • You evaluated both and doublecmd fits your workflow better

full doublecmd profile →

About LocalSend

LocalSend is a free, open source, cross platform application that shares files and messages directly between nearby devices over the local network, and it is built for anyone who wants AirDrop style transfers without an internet connection or a third party server.

read the full LocalSend overview →

About doublecmd

Double Commander is a free, cross platform, open source file manager that shows two panels side by side (or one above the other), and it is aimed at desktop users who want a twin pane file manager they can inspect and run without paying for a licence.

read the full doublecmd overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K Affine ★ 73K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve rustdesk vs localsend openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

LocalSend vs rclone LocalSend vs copyparty LocalSend vs Files LocalSend vs yazi LocalSend vs Spacedrive LocalSend vs Nextcloud LocalSend vs uppy LocalSend vs cloudreve LocalSend vs superfile LocalSend vs ranger LocalSend vs Seafile LocalSend vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is LocalSend or doublecmd more popular?

LocalSend has 92,628 GitHub stars and doublecmd has 4,564. LocalSend has the larger community by that measure.

Are LocalSend and doublecmd free?

Both are open source. LocalSend is licensed under Apache-2.0 and doublecmd under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between LocalSend and doublecmd?

LocalSend is written in Dart and doublecmd in Pascal. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, LocalSend or doublecmd?

Choose LocalSend if you want the larger community (92,628 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose doublecmd if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.