head to head · open source

Linkding vs Readeck

Linkding has 11,196 GitHub stars, 616 forks, 221 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Readeck has 275 stars, 0 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped 2.8 years ago. Linkding leads on adoption by 3,971% (11,196 vs 275 stars). Linkding is written in Python under MIT; Readeck is written in various languages under a licence not recorded in this registry. Linkding has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Readeck 0%. Linkding was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Linkding ★ 11K Readeck ★ 275 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Linkding Readeck
GitHub stars ★ 11K ★ 275
License MIT Custom / other
Written in Python
Last push 2026-09-13 2023-12-18
Forks ⑂ 616 ⑂ 0
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Linkding if

  • You weight community size — 11K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Linkding profile →

pick Readeck if

  • You want the Readeck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You evaluated both and Readeck fits your workflow better

full Readeck profile →

About Linkding

Linkding is an open source, self hosted bookmark manager written in Python and built on the Django web framework. It is released under the MIT license and is presented as a minimal, fast tool that is easy to set up using Docker. The project lives in the self hosted productivity and bookmark management ecosystem, with Firefox and Chrome extensions, a Progressive Web App option, a REST API, and community projects such as mobile apps and libraries.

read the full Linkding overview →

About Readeck

Readeck is a tool for saving, organizing and revisiting web content, aimed at people who want to keep the pages they read and come back to them later.

read the full Readeck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

karakeep vs linkding linkwarden vs linkding karakeep vs linkwarden karakeep vs wallabag linkwarden vs wallabag karakeep vs ryot karakeep vs seriesguide karakeep vs showly n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Bookmark & Content Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Bookmark & Content Management field.

Linkding vs Karakeep Linkding vs Linkwarden Linkding vs Wallabag Linkding vs Ryot Linkding vs SeriesGuide Linkding vs Showly Linkding vs Faved Linkding vs Tonkatsu Box Linkding vs Bookmark It Linkding vs Brace.to Linkding vs Cloudmark Linkding vs Capd

Frequently asked questions

Is Linkding or Readeck more popular?

Linkding has 11,196 GitHub stars and Readeck has 275. Linkding has the larger community by that measure.

Are Linkding and Readeck free?

Both are open source. Linkding is licensed under MIT, and Readeck has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Linkding and Readeck?

Linkding is written in Python and Readeck in various languages. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Linkding or Readeck?

Choose Linkding if you want the larger community (11,196 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Readeck if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.