head to head · open source
Ladybird vs webui
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars, 3,193 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. webui has 4,647 stars, 309 forks, 6 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 1,337% (66,797 vs 4,647 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; webui is written in C under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, webui 7%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | webui | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 4.6K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | C++ | C |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 309 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick webui if
- You want the webui feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and webui fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About webui
WebUI v2.5.0 beta.4 [build status]: [last commit]: [release version]: [license]: [![][build status]]( [![][last commit]]( [![][release version]]( [![][license]]( Use any web browser or WebView as GUI, with your preferred language in the backend and modern web technologies in the frontend, all in a lightweight portable library. Ask AI Any Question About the WebUI WebUI GPT C/C++ Download Latest Stable Release Nightly Build Contents Features Showcase UI & The Web Technologies Documentation Build Examples Wrappers Supported Web Browsers License Documentation Online Documentation Features Portable ( Only needs a web…
read the full webui overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or webui more popular?
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars and webui has 4,647. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and webui free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and webui under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and webui?
Ladybird is written in C++ and webui in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or webui?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,797 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose webui if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.