head to head · open source

uBlock vs Ladybird

uBlock has 67,923 GitHub stars, 4,353 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird has 66,237 stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. uBlock leads on adoption by 3% (67,923 vs 66,237 stars). uBlock is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause. uBlock has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, Ladybird 5%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uBlock ★ 68K Ladybird ★ 66K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

uBlock Ladybird
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 66K
License GPL-3.0 BSD-2-Clause
Written in JavaScript C++
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 3.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uBlock if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uBlock profile →

pick Ladybird if

  • You want the Ladybird feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and Ladybird fits your workflow better

full Ladybird profile →

About uBlock

uBlock Origin is a CPU and memory efficient, wide spectrum content blocker for Chromium and Firefox, aimed at anyone who wants ads, trackers, coin miners, popups, anti blockers and malware sites neutralised by default without hand tuning anything.

read the full uBlock overview →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify n8n vs mole

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

uBlock vs chrome-devtools-mcp uBlock vs monaco-editor uBlock vs Zen Browser uBlock vs servo uBlock vs serenity uBlock vs refined-github uBlock vs slate uBlock vs Avalonia uBlock vs webtorrent uBlock vs fingerprintjs uBlock vs obscura uBlock vs quasar

Frequently asked questions

Is uBlock or Ladybird more popular?

uBlock has 67,923 GitHub stars and Ladybird has 66,237. uBlock has the larger community by that measure.

Are uBlock and Ladybird free?

Both are open source. uBlock is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Ladybird under BSD-2-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uBlock and Ladybird?

uBlock is written in JavaScript and Ladybird in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uBlock or Ladybird?

Choose uBlock if you want the larger community (67,923 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Ladybird if its feature set, stack or BSD-2-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.