head to head · open source

uBlock vs obscura

uBlock has 67,923 GitHub stars, 4,353 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. obscura has 27,331 stars, 2,005 forks, 134 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. uBlock leads on adoption by 149% (67,923 vs 27,331 stars). uBlock is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; obscura is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. uBlock has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, obscura 7%. uBlock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uBlock ★ 68K obscura ★ 27K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

uBlock obscura
GitHub stars ★ 68K ★ 27K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 2.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uBlock if

  • You weight community size — 68K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uBlock profile →

pick obscura if

  • You want the obscura feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and obscura fits your workflow better

full obscura profile →

About uBlock

uBlock Origin is a CPU and memory efficient, wide spectrum content blocker for Chromium and Firefox, aimed at anyone who wants ads, trackers, coin miners, popups, anti blockers and malware sites neutralised by default without hand tuning anything.

read the full uBlock overview →

About obscura

Obscura is an open source headless browser engine written in Rust, built for web scraping and AI agent automation. It runs real JavaScript through V8, speaks the Chrome DevTools Protocol, and presents itself as a drop in replacement for headless Chrome when driven by Puppeteer or Playwright. The project lives in the browser automation and headless browser corner of the Rust ecosystem, and it ships under the Apache 2.0 license.

read the full obscura overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

uBlock vs Ladybird uBlock vs chrome-devtools-mcp uBlock vs monaco-editor uBlock vs Zen Browser uBlock vs servo uBlock vs serenity uBlock vs refined-github uBlock vs slate uBlock vs Avalonia uBlock vs webtorrent uBlock vs fingerprintjs uBlock vs quasar

Frequently asked questions

Is uBlock or obscura more popular?

uBlock has 67,923 GitHub stars and obscura has 27,331. uBlock has the larger community by that measure.

Are uBlock and obscura free?

Both are open source. uBlock is licensed under GPL-3.0 and obscura under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uBlock and obscura?

uBlock is written in JavaScript and obscura in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uBlock or obscura?

Choose uBlock if you want the larger community (67,923 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose obscura if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.