head to head · open source
uBlock vs quasar
uBlock has 69,033 GitHub stars, 4,427 forks, 15 open issues and last shipped yesterday. quasar has 27,210 stars, 3,668 forks, 74 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. uBlock leads on adoption by 154% (69,033 vs 27,210 stars). uBlock is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0; quasar is written in JavaScript under MIT. uBlock has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, quasar 13%. uBlock was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser-extension, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| uBlock | quasar | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 69K | ★ 27K |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | JavaScript | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-19 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.4K | ⑂ 3.7K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick uBlock if
- You weight community size — 69K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick quasar if
- You want the quasar feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and quasar fits your workflow better
About uBlock
[![Badge Commits]][Commit Rate] [![Badge Issues]][Issues] [![Badge Localization]][Crowdin] [![Badge License]][License] [![Badge NPM]][NPM] [![Badge Mozilla]][Mozilla] ![Badge Chrome] [![Badge Edge]][Edge] uBlock Origin (uBO) GitHub Releases Stable and development versions on Firefox, Chromium MV2, and Thunderbird. Must be placed manually into web browsers; the Chromium and Thunderbird versions usually won't auto update. Related: uBlock Origin Lite uBlock Origin (uBO) is a CPU and memory efficient [wide spectrum content blocker][Blocking] for Chromium and Firefox. It blocks ads, trackers, coin miners, popups…
read the full uBlock overview →
About quasar
Quasar Framework Build high performance Vue.js user interfaces in record time: responsive Single Page Apps, SSR Apps, SSG Apps, PWAs, browser extensions, hybrid mobile apps and Electron apps. If you want, all using the same codebase! Please submit a PR to with your website/app/Quasar tutorial/video etc. Thank you! Supporting Quasar Quasar Framework is an MIT licensed open source project. Its ongoing development is made possible thanks to the support by our awesome sponsors and backers. Please consider supporting our efforts, too! If you use Quasar at work, drop a message to your management about sponsoring us at…
read the full quasar overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is uBlock or quasar more popular?
uBlock has 69,033 GitHub stars and quasar has 27,210. uBlock has the larger community by that measure.
Are uBlock and quasar free?
Both are open source. uBlock is licensed under GPL-3.0 and quasar under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between uBlock and quasar?
uBlock is written in JavaScript and quasar in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, uBlock or quasar?
Choose uBlock if you want the larger community (69,033 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose quasar if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.