head to head · open source

Ladybird vs Screenity

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Screenity has 18,703 stars, 1,521 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 254% (66,237 vs 18,703 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Screenity 8%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K Screenity ★ 19K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird Screenity
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 19K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C++ JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick Screenity if

  • You want the Screenity feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and Screenity fits your workflow better

full Screenity profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About Screenity

Screenity is a JavaScript Chrome extension under the GPL 3.0 license that records the screen and supports annotation in the browser. It lives in the Chrome extension ecosystem and is distributed through the Chrome Web Store, while its source code is available on GitHub.

read the full Screenity overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or Screenity more popular?

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars and Screenity has 18,703. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and Screenity free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Screenity under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and Screenity?

Ladybird is written in C++ and Screenity in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or Screenity?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,237 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose Screenity if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.