head to head · open source
Ladybird vs Screenity
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars, 3,193 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Screenity has 18,894 stars, 1,538 forks, 8 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 254% (66,797 vs 18,894 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; Screenity is written in JavaScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, Screenity 8%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | Screenity | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 19K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-25 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick Screenity if
- You want the Screenity feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and Screenity fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About Screenity
Screenity ✨ Screenity's open source work is sponsored by Recall.ai API for desktop recording If you’re looking for a hosted desktop recording API, consider checking out Recall.ai, an API that records Zoom, Google Meet, Microsoft Teams, in person meetings, and more. The free and privacy friendly screen recorder with no limits 🎥 Get it now it's free! Screenity is a powerful privacy friendly screen recorder and annotation tool to make better videos for work, education, and more. You can create stunning product demos, tutorials, presentations, or share feedback with your team all for free. Want to support the…
read the full Screenity overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or Screenity more popular?
Ladybird has 66,797 GitHub stars and Screenity has 18,894. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and Screenity free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and Screenity under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and Screenity?
Ladybird is written in C++ and Screenity in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or Screenity?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,797 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose Screenity if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.