head to head · open source

Ladybird vs plasmo

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. plasmo has 13,151 stars, 460 forks, 371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Ladybird leads on adoption by 404% (66,237 vs 13,151 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; plasmo is written in TypeScript under MIT. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, plasmo 3%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K plasmo ★ 13K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird plasmo
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 13K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 460
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick plasmo if

  • You want the plasmo feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and plasmo fits your workflow better

full plasmo profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About plasmo

Plasmo is an MIT licensed, TypeScript based browser extension framework that packages the build toolchain, manifest generation, and runtime APIs for Chrome, Edge, and Firefox add ons into a single SDK for React and TypeScript developers.

read the full plasmo overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or plasmo more popular?

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars and plasmo has 13,151. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and plasmo free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and plasmo under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and plasmo?

Ladybird is written in C++ and plasmo in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or plasmo?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,237 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose plasmo if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.