head to head · open source
Ladybird vs pasteguard
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pasteguard has 805 stars, 44 forks, 4 open issues and last shipped 21 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 8,199% (66,807 vs 805 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; pasteguard is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, pasteguard 5%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | pasteguard | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 805 |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 44 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pasteguard if
- You want the pasteguard feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and pasteguard fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About pasteguard
AI gets the context. Not your private data. PasteGuard masks PII and secrets before they reach ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, your API provider, Codex, or Claude Code. Browser Chat · Apps & APIs · Coding Agents · Documentation You keep the originals. Providers see placeholders. Run it locally or self host it in your own infrastructure. What PasteGuard Protects PasteGuard is a local first privacy layer for teams that cannot send raw client data, customer records, logs, credentials, or production details directly to model providers. It works in three places: Browser Chat ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini. Paste customer…
read the full pasteguard overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or pasteguard more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and pasteguard has 805. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and pasteguard free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and pasteguard under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and pasteguard?
Ladybird is written in C++ and pasteguard in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or pasteguard?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose pasteguard if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.