head to head · open source

Ladybird vs NooBox

Ladybird has 66,240 GitHub stars, 3,162 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. NooBox has 524 stars, 54 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 12,541% (66,240 vs 524 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; NooBox is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, NooBox 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K NooBox ★ 524 category Productivity & Utilities

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird NooBox
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 524
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2025-11-21
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 54
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick NooBox if

  • You want the NooBox feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and NooBox fits your workflow better

full NooBox profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About NooBox

NooBox is a GPL 3.0 Chrome extension, written in TypeScript and React, that bundles reverse image search, bulk image extraction, timed page refresh and HTML5 video control into one toolbar download for people who want those utilities without installing several separate extensions.

read the full NooBox overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser browser-use vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or NooBox more popular?

Ladybird has 66,240 GitHub stars and NooBox has 524. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and NooBox free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and NooBox under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and NooBox?

Ladybird is written in C++ and NooBox in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or NooBox?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,240 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose NooBox if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.