head to head · open source
Ladybird vs chathub
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars, 3,194 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chathub has 10,654 stars, 1,112 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 14 days ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 527% (66,807 vs 10,654 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; chathub is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chathub 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Ladybird | chathub | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 67K | ★ 11K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Written in | C++ | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-20 |
| Forks | ⑂ 3.2K | ⑂ 1.1K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Ladybird if
- You weight community size — 67K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches C++
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick chathub if
- You want the chathub feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and chathub fits your workflow better
About Ladybird
Ladybird Ladybird is a truly independent web browser, using a novel engine based on web standards. [!IMPORTANT] Ladybird is in a pre alpha state, and only suitable for use by developers Features We aim to build a complete, usable browser for the modern web. Ladybird uses a multi process architecture with a main UI process, several WebContent renderer processes, an ImageDecoder process, and a RequestServer process. Image decoding and network connections are done out of process to be more robust against malicious content. Each tab has its own renderer process, which is sandboxed from the rest of the system. At the…
read the full Ladybird overview →
About chathub
ChatHub Install 📷 Screenshot 🤝 Sponsors ✨ Features 🤖 Use different chatbots in one app, currently supporting ChatGPT, new Bing Chat, Google Bard, Claude, and open source models including LLama2, Vicuna, ChatGLM etc 💬 Chat with multiple chatbots at the same time, making it easy to compare their answers 🚀 Support ChatGPT API and GPT 4 Browsing 🔍 Shortcut to quickly activate the app anywhere in the browser 🎨 Markdown and code highlight support 📚 Prompt Library for custom prompts and community prompts 💾 Conversation history saved locally 📥 Export and Import all your data 🔗 Share conversation to markdown…
read the full chathub overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Ladybird or chathub more popular?
Ladybird has 66,807 GitHub stars and chathub has 10,654. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.
Are Ladybird and chathub free?
Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and chathub under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Ladybird and chathub?
Ladybird is written in C++ and chathub in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Ladybird or chathub?
Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,807 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose chathub if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.