head to head · open source

Ladybird vs chathub

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars, 3,163 forks, 535 open issues and last shipped yesterday. chathub has 10,652 stars, 1,116 forks, 16 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Ladybird leads on adoption by 522% (66,237 vs 10,652 stars). Ladybird is written in C++ under BSD-2-Clause; chathub is written in TypeScript under GPL-3.0. Ladybird has attracted 5% as many forks as stars, chathub 10%. Ladybird was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Ladybird ★ 66K chathub ★ 11K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Ladybird chathub
GitHub stars ★ 66K ★ 11K
License BSD-2-Clause GPL-3.0
Written in C++ TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-02-27
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 1.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Ladybird if

  • You weight community size — 66K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Ladybird profile →

pick chathub if

  • You want the chathub feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and chathub fits your workflow better

full chathub profile →

About Ladybird

Ladybird is a truly independent web browser and browser engine, written from scratch in C++ rather than as a fork of any existing engine, and it is built for developers who want to work on a browser engine based on web standards while it remains in a pre alpha state.

read the full Ladybird overview →

About chathub

ChatHub is an open source browser extension that puts multiple AI chatbots inside one interface. Written in TypeScript under the GPL 3.0 license, it lives in the Chrome and Edge extension ecosystem, with a companion web app at chathub.gg. The repository has been active for roughly four years, has collected more than ten thousand stars and about eleven hundred forks, and carries a small number of open issues.

read the full chathub overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs monaco-editor ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Ladybird vs uBlock Ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp Ladybird vs monaco-editor Ladybird vs Zen Browser Ladybird vs servo Ladybird vs serenity Ladybird vs refined-github Ladybird vs slate Ladybird vs Avalonia Ladybird vs webtorrent Ladybird vs fingerprintjs Ladybird vs obscura

Frequently asked questions

Is Ladybird or chathub more popular?

Ladybird has 66,237 GitHub stars and chathub has 10,652. Ladybird has the larger community by that measure.

Are Ladybird and chathub free?

Both are open source. Ladybird is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and chathub under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Ladybird and chathub?

Ladybird is written in C++ and chathub in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Ladybird or chathub?

Choose Ladybird if you want the larger community (66,237 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose chathub if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.