head to head · open source

Joplin vs fsnotes

Joplin has 56,429 GitHub stars, 6,297 forks, 632 open issues and last shipped yesterday. fsnotes has 7,494 stars, 578 forks, 2 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Joplin leads on adoption by 653% (56,429 vs 7,494 stars). Joplin is written in TypeScript under a custom or non-standard licence; fsnotes is written in Swift under MIT. Joplin has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, fsnotes 8%. fsnotes was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (note-taking), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Joplin ★ 56K fsnotes ★ 7.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Joplin fsnotes
GitHub stars ★ 56K ★ 7.5K
License Custom / other MIT
Written in TypeScript Swift
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 6.3K ⑂ 578
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Joplin if

  • You weight community size — 56K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Joplin profile →

pick fsnotes if

  • You want the fsnotes feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Swift
  • You evaluated both and fsnotes fits your workflow better

full fsnotes profile →

About Joplin

Joplin is a free, open source, privacy focused note taking and to do application that keeps notes as Markdown on your own device and synchronises them, end to end encrypted, across Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.

read the full Joplin overview →

About fsnotes

FSNotes is a fast, native Markdown and plain text note taking app for macOS and iOS, written in Swift 5 and released under the MIT licence, built for people who want their notes kept as portable files rather than inside a proprietary database.

read the full fsnotes overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

appflowy vs joplin openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Note Taking & Knowledge Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Note Taking & Knowledge Management field.

Joplin vs AppFlowy Joplin vs Memos Joplin vs SiYuan Joplin vs Logseq Joplin vs Outline Joplin vs Open-Notebook Joplin vs Khoj Joplin vs Docmost Joplin vs Tolaria Joplin vs SurfSense Joplin vs Zotero Joplin vs Notesnook

Frequently asked questions

Is Joplin or fsnotes more popular?

Joplin has 56,429 GitHub stars and fsnotes has 7,494. Joplin has the larger community by that measure.

Are Joplin and fsnotes free?

Both are open source. Joplin has no licence declared in this registry, and fsnotes is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Joplin and fsnotes?

Joplin is written in TypeScript and fsnotes in Swift. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Joplin or fsnotes?

Choose Joplin if you want the larger community (56,429 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose fsnotes if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.