head to head · open source
javascript-obfuscator vs peerjs
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. peerjs has 13,501 stars, 1,460 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped 8 months ago. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 21% (16,318 vs 13,501 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; peerjs is written in TypeScript under MIT. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, peerjs 11%. javascript-obfuscator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, javascript), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| javascript-obfuscator | peerjs | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 14K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-02-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 1.5K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick peerjs if
- You want the peerjs feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and peerjs fits your workflow better
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
About peerjs
PeerJS: Simple peer to peer with WebRTC PeerJS provides a complete, configurable, and easy to use peer to peer API built on top of WebRTC, supporting both data channels and media streams. Live Example Here's an example application that uses both media and data connections: The example also uses its own PeerServer. Special Announcement: We now have a Discord Channel There we plan to discuss roadmaps, feature requests, and more Join us today Setup Include the library with npm: npm install peerjs with yarn: yarn add peerjs Create a Peer Data connections Connect Receive Media calls Call Answer Running tests Browser…
read the full peerjs overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is javascript-obfuscator or peerjs more popular?
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and peerjs has 13,501. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.
Are javascript-obfuscator and peerjs free?
Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and peerjs under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and peerjs?
javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and peerjs in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or peerjs?
Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose peerjs if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.