head to head · open source

javascript-obfuscator vs nanobrowser

javascript-obfuscator has 16,257 GitHub stars, 1,741 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped 9 days ago. nanobrowser has 13,809 stars, 1,456 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 18% (16,257 vs 13,809 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; nanobrowser is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, nanobrowser 11%. javascript-obfuscator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

javascript-obfuscator ★ 16K nanobrowser ★ 14K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

javascript-obfuscator nanobrowser
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 14K
License BSD-2-Clause Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-09 2026-08-18
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 1.5K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick javascript-obfuscator if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full javascript-obfuscator profile →

pick nanobrowser if

  • You want the nanobrowser feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and nanobrowser fits your workflow better

full nanobrowser profile →

About javascript-obfuscator

JavaScript Obfuscator is a free, BSD 2 Clause licensed TypeScript obfuscator for JavaScript and Node.js source code, built for developers who need to ship browser or server side JavaScript that is hard to read, tamper with, or reverse engineer.

read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →

About nanobrowser

Nanobrowser is an open source Chrome extension for AI powered web automation that runs multi agent workflows inside your own browser using your own LLM API key, built for people who want Operator style browser agents without a subscription.

read the full nanobrowser overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

ublock vs ladybird ublock vs chrome-devtools-mcp ladybird vs chrome-devtools-mcp ublock vs monaco-editor ladybird vs monaco-editor ublock vs zen-browser ladybird vs zen-browser ublock vs servo n8n vs browser-use n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces n8n vs skyvern n8n vs automa n8n vs livekit n8n vs obs-studio n8n vs sharex n8n vs kap excalidraw vs obs-studio n8n vs snapify excalidraw vs sharex excalidraw vs kap excalidraw vs snapify

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

javascript-obfuscator vs uBlock javascript-obfuscator vs Ladybird javascript-obfuscator vs chrome-devtools-mcp javascript-obfuscator vs monaco-editor javascript-obfuscator vs Zen Browser javascript-obfuscator vs servo javascript-obfuscator vs serenity javascript-obfuscator vs refined-github javascript-obfuscator vs slate javascript-obfuscator vs Avalonia javascript-obfuscator vs webtorrent javascript-obfuscator vs fingerprintjs

Frequently asked questions

Is javascript-obfuscator or nanobrowser more popular?

javascript-obfuscator has 16,257 GitHub stars and nanobrowser has 13,809. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.

Are javascript-obfuscator and nanobrowser free?

Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and nanobrowser under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and nanobrowser?

javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and nanobrowser in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or nanobrowser?

Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,257 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose nanobrowser if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.