head to head · open source
javascript-obfuscator vs LanguageTool
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. LanguageTool has 15,229 stars, 1,598 forks, 2,148 open issues and last shipped yesterday. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 7% (16,318 vs 15,229 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; LanguageTool is written in Java under LGPL-2.1. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, LanguageTool 10%. LanguageTool was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| javascript-obfuscator | LanguageTool | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 15K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | LGPL-2.1 |
| Written in | TypeScript | Java |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick LanguageTool if
- You want the LanguageTool feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the LGPL-2.1 license terms
- Your stack matches Java
- You evaluated both and LanguageTool fits your workflow better
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
About LanguageTool
LanguageTool LanguageTool is open source proofreading software for English, Spanish, French, German, Portuguese, Polish, Dutch, and more than 20 other languages. It finds many errors that a simple spell checker cannot detect. LanguageTool Forum How to run your own LanguageTool server HTTP API documentation How to use our public server via HTTP How to use LanguageTool from Java (Javadoc) For more information, please see our homepage, at languagetool.org , this README , and CHANGES . The LanguageTool core (this repo) is freely available under the LGPL 2.1 or later. Docker Try one of the following projects for a…
read the full LanguageTool overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is javascript-obfuscator or LanguageTool more popular?
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and LanguageTool has 15,229. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.
Are javascript-obfuscator and LanguageTool free?
Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and LanguageTool under LGPL-2.1. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and LanguageTool?
javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and LanguageTool in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or LanguageTool?
Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose LanguageTool if its feature set, stack or LGPL-2.1 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.