head to head · open source

javascript-obfuscator vs kysely

javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kysely has 14,327 stars, 456 forks, 173 open issues and last shipped yesterday. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 14% (16,318 vs 14,327 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; kysely is written in TypeScript under MIT. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, kysely 3%. kysely was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (browser, nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

javascript-obfuscator ★ 16K kysely ★ 14K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

javascript-obfuscator kysely
GitHub stars ★ 16K ★ 14K
License BSD-2-Clause MIT
Written in TypeScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-11-02 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 1.7K ⑂ 456
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick javascript-obfuscator if

  • You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
  • You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full javascript-obfuscator profile →

pick kysely if

  • You want the kysely feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and kysely fits your workflow better

full kysely profile →

About javascript-obfuscator

JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…

read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →

About kysely

Join the discussion ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ Get started & more! Kysely Kysely (pronounce “Key Seh Lee”) is a type safe and autocompletion friendly TypeScript SQL query builder. Inspired by Knex.js. Mainly developed for Node.js but also runs on all other JavaScript environments like Deno, Bun, Cloudflare Workers and web browsers. Kysely makes sure you only refer to tables and columns that are visible to the part of the query you're writing. The result type only has the selected columns with correct types and aliases. As an added bonus you get autocompletion for all that stuff. As shown in the gif above, through the pure magic of…

read the full kysely overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

Related comparisons

More Browsers & Extensions projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.

Frequently asked questions

Is javascript-obfuscator or kysely more popular?

javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and kysely has 14,327. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.

Are javascript-obfuscator and kysely free?

Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and kysely under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and kysely?

javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and kysely in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or kysely?

Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose kysely if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.