head to head · open source
javascript-obfuscator vs HackBrowserData
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 26 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HackBrowserData has 14,661 stars, 1,809 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped yesterday. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 11% (16,318 vs 14,661 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; HackBrowserData is written in Go under MIT. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, HackBrowserData 12%. HackBrowserData was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (browser), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| javascript-obfuscator | HackBrowserData | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 15K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 1.8K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick HackBrowserData if
- You want the HackBrowserData feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and HackBrowserData fits your workflow better
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
About HackBrowserData
HackBrowserData HackBrowserData is a command line tool for decrypting and exporting browser data (passwords, history, cookies, bookmarks, credit cards, download history, localStorage, sessionStorage and extensions) from the browser. It supports the most popular Chromium based browsers and Firefox on Windows, macOS and Linux, plus Safari on macOS. It can also decrypt data across machines and operating systems : export the master keys on the origin host, then decrypt a copy of the data offline on any other host — even for a browser that the analyst host's OS cannot run (see Cross host decryption). Disclaimer: This…
read the full HackBrowserData overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is javascript-obfuscator or HackBrowserData more popular?
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and HackBrowserData has 14,661. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.
Are javascript-obfuscator and HackBrowserData free?
Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and HackBrowserData under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and HackBrowserData?
javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and HackBrowserData in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or HackBrowserData?
Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose HackBrowserData if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.