head to head · open source
javascript-obfuscator vs feathers
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars, 1,746 forks, 24 open issues and last shipped yesterday. feathers has 15,256 stars, 802 forks, 121 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. javascript-obfuscator leads on adoption by 7% (16,318 vs 15,256 stars). javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript under BSD-2-Clause; feathers is written in TypeScript under MIT. javascript-obfuscator has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, feathers 5%. javascript-obfuscator was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (browser, javascript, nodejs), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| javascript-obfuscator | feathers | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 16K | ★ 15K |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Written in | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-11-01 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.7K | ⑂ 802 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick javascript-obfuscator if
- You weight community size — 16K stars and counting
- You want the BSD-2-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick feathers if
- You want the feathers feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and feathers fits your workflow better
About javascript-obfuscator
JavaScript obfuscator :rocket: Obfuscator.io with VM Obfuscation Obfuscator.io adds VM based bytecode obfuscation to this package your JavaScript functions are compiled to custom bytecode that runs on an embedded virtual machine. Each build produces unique opcodes and VM structure, making reverse engineering and automated deobfuscation dramatically harder. Visit Obfuscator.io · Pro API methods This package provides access to Obfuscator.io API via CLI and Node.js API. Do you use JavaScript Obfuscator at your company? JavaScript Obfuscator has reached over 1 million npm downloads per week . I am currently…
read the full javascript-obfuscator overview →
About feathers
Feathers is a full stack framework for creating web APIs and real time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. Feathers can interact with any backend technology, supports many databases out of the box and works with any frontend like React, VueJS, Angular, React Native, Android or iOS. Getting started Get started with just three commands: To learn more about Feathers visit the website at feathersjs.com or jump right into the Feathers guides. Contributing To start developing, clone this repository, then run: To run all tests run Individual tests can be run in the module you are working on: License Copyright…
read the full feathers overview →
More in Productivity & Utilities
Related comparisons
More Browsers & Extensions projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Browsers & Extensions field.
Frequently asked questions
Is javascript-obfuscator or feathers more popular?
javascript-obfuscator has 16,318 GitHub stars and feathers has 15,256. javascript-obfuscator has the larger community by that measure.
Are javascript-obfuscator and feathers free?
Both are open source. javascript-obfuscator is licensed under BSD-2-Clause and feathers under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between javascript-obfuscator and feathers?
javascript-obfuscator is written in TypeScript and feathers in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, javascript-obfuscator or feathers?
Choose javascript-obfuscator if you want the larger community (16,318 stars) or its BSD-2-Clause licence terms. Choose feathers if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.