head to head · open source

jaeger vs opentelemetry-cpp

jaeger has 23,375 GitHub stars, 3,223 forks, 547 open issues and last shipped yesterday. opentelemetry-cpp has 1,389 stars, 660 forks, 290 open issues and last shipped yesterday. jaeger leads on adoption by 1,583% (23,375 vs 1,389 stars). jaeger is written in Go under Apache-2.0; opentelemetry-cpp is written in C++ under Apache-2.0. jaeger has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, opentelemetry-cpp 48%. jaeger was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (distributed-tracing, opentelemetry), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

jaeger ★ 23K opentelemetry-cpp ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

jaeger opentelemetry-cpp
GitHub stars ★ 23K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go C++
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-11-04
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 660
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick jaeger if

  • You weight community size — 23K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full jaeger profile →

pick opentelemetry-cpp if

  • You want the opentelemetry-cpp feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and opentelemetry-cpp fits your workflow better

full opentelemetry-cpp profile →

About jaeger

[![Slack chat][slack img]]( get in touch) [![Unit Tests][ci img]][ci] [![Coverage Status][cov img]][cov] [![Project+Community stats][community badge]][community stats] [![FOSSA Status][fossa img]][fossa] [![OpenSSF Scorecard][openssf img]][openssf] [![OpenSSF Best Practices][openssf bp img]][openssf bp] [![CLOMonitor][clomonitor img]][clomonitor] [![Artifact Hub][artifacthub img]][artifacthub] Jaeger a Distributed Tracing System 💥💥💥 Jaeger v2 is out! Read the blog post and try it out. Quick Start Get Jaeger running in seconds with Docker: For production deployments and more options, see the Getting Started…

read the full jaeger overview →

About opentelemetry-cpp

OpenTelemetry C++ The C++ OpenTelemetry client. Project Status Stable across all 3 signals i.e. Logs , Metrics , and Traces . See Spec Compliance Matrix to understand which portions of the specification has been implemented in this repo. Supported C++ Versions Code shipped from this repository generally supports the following versions of C++ standards: ISO/IEC 14882:2014 (C++14) ISO/IEC 14882:2017 (C++17) ISO/IEC 14882:2020 (C++20) ISO/IEC 14882:2024 (C++23) Any exceptions to this are noted in the individual README.md files. Please note that supporting the C Programming Language) is not a goal of the current…

read the full opentelemetry-cpp overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is jaeger or opentelemetry-cpp more popular?

jaeger has 23,375 GitHub stars and opentelemetry-cpp has 1,389. jaeger has the larger community by that measure.

Are jaeger and opentelemetry-cpp free?

Both are open source. jaeger is licensed under Apache-2.0 and opentelemetry-cpp under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between jaeger and opentelemetry-cpp?

jaeger is written in Go and opentelemetry-cpp in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, jaeger or opentelemetry-cpp?

Choose jaeger if you want the larger community (23,375 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose opentelemetry-cpp if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.